The
following contains quotes and thoughts that I took away from an informal TV meeting about 'Writing Disabled Characters'. I did
not partake in the free wine but I did eat some crisps.
“There was
a time not that long ago when black people were not being represented in drama
and comedy on our screens.” says a well-known writer. “We used to have to be very
specific in our scripts that a character was black or Asian say, but recently I
wrote a script and when I saw the final production, the casting department had
cast black actors without any mention of colour or race being mentioned in the
script at all and I thought, ‘Brilliant! Look how far we have come in
representing real life and people equally!’ I guess when it comes to writing
for disabled characters, it is a case of just doing it and putting these
characters specifically in to scripts so that soon enough it becomes the norm as
opposed to the exception.”
 |
| "I'm willing if she is." Ding dong Dinklage! (Tyrion Lannister, 'Game of Thrones.') |
There are
10 million disabled people in the UK. That’s approximately 18% of the
population. Statistics show that disabled characters are represented at 0.9% so
the question being asked was – are disabled people being fairly represented in
TV and radio? Erm, no as it turns out. I am sat in a room full of writers, producers, directors and TV folk, some of whom have a disability, who have come to answer any questions in an open and frank debate on the subject. It all starts with the script, so why
are writers not writing disabled characters? And are they doing a good enough job when they do?
1) FEAR OF
OFFENDING – with the Ricky Gervais debates about ‘Derek’ and ‘Life’s Too Short’
characters causing such a stir in the press, it is no wonder writers are
fearful of writing characters who are seen as disabled. The media relish
stories of how offensive these characters are and how Ricky should be ashamed
of making jokes at the expense of someone else’s ‘misfortune’ but does this
perhaps say more about the society we live in than it does about the
disability being portrayed? A deaf lady at the event says she is fed up of
disability being seen as an illness, because it’s only seen as an illness by
people passing judgement on each other. Do writers then get too scared to write
disabled characters for fear of offending? To take the path of avoiding writing
for disabled characters at all or worse still, to simply not even think about
it? When creating a character does the idea of disability even come into it? The whole four letter word beginning with ‘m’ debate with regards Gervais
was clearly a very stupid and thoughtless thing to do and if he didn’t know so before
he sure does now. But can we learn anything from his triumphs and mistakes?
2) IGNORANCE – writers have the best tool of all - the ability to inspire and move people
through the act of writing. And yet when it comes to disabilities writers seem
to be too scared to go there when it all it takes is a bit of investigation and
thought, a quick Google search and a phone call to a charity or organisation
will get you all the answers you need. People in the disabled community are
telling us writers that they are tired of disability being used as a device or
watered down so it becomes a plot point. ‘Inflicting’ a disability on to a
character like a punishment, seeing that character’s storyline become ‘flavour
of the month’ only to then cure them or kill them off. When you stop and think
about it, how often do you see a character go on to lead their life quite
happily with a disability? Working, dating and doing all the things any other
character ever gets to do?
 |
| "You idiot. I'm. Joey. Lucas." (West Wing) |
A deaf gentleman
tells me “When my phone rings at home, the lights flash on and off to tell me
someone’s calling. If that was on TV there would be close ups of the lights
flashing and it would be a big deal, but it’s just the phone ringing to me,
it’s normal, it’s normal for a lot of deaf people. Sometimes how characters are
written, it makes me feel like a victim of my disability but this is not how I
feel in real life at all. I’m not a victim, the people that see me as such are
a victim themselves of societies misconceptions about disability.”
3) THE VICTIM
OR VILLAIN CLICHÉ - Someone shouts out “I would like to see disabled characters
on screen who are arseholes!” A female actress in a wheelchair replies “I’m dying
to play a complete bitch, not another disabled person who is hard done by and
angelic to boot.” Shocking news flash, disabled people are people who struggle
with all the emotional choices we all do – so
why do we continue to put disability before personality when developing
characters and writing storylines?
 |
| Blimey. (Tee Hee, James Bond - 'Live and Let Die') |
On the
flip side of course are those that use disability to portray villains,
especially disabilities that have an outward, physical attribute. It would
appear there are only ever extremes to be had when it comes to writing disabled
characters. Perhaps James Bond antagonists are the best example of this. Yep,
if you have a disability you are a victim or a villain, no wonder this meeting
has been called, it’s starting to feel long overdue.
4) INCIDENTAL
NOT ACCIDENTAL – Wouldn’t it be something
if a character just happened to be disabled. No big event in a script that causes the disability, just a character, looking
for love and happiness, who incidentally is disabled.
Why could
it not be the character of John, who has a wicked sense of humour, loves
sci-fi, wants to be a doctor and has cerebral palsy, as opposed to John, the
guy who has cerebral palsy, how sad? Have you thought that perhaps it isn’t sad
at all for John? That John could kick your ass at the pub quiz, that he fancies
your sister who fancies him back and he’s a drug dealer to the local kids? Is
that a shocking thing to write? Shocking because he also happens to be
disabled?
Disabled
people are telling us that there of course are some things in life that are a
bit different for them to go through. One lady with a disfigurement tells me “You
know, I go on dates and guys turn up and see I am disabled. I can see it in
their face and I say to them ‘if you can’t handle this, the disability, then
that’s okay.’ Of course those without an obvious disability would not have to
go through this type of rejection in quite the same way, but it’s still just
rejection and it’s no big deal. I will go on another date and another just like
anyone else, in fact I did and I met my husband because he saw me for me. Isn’t
that the same for everyone? Looking past what people look like to get to know
the real them?"
 |
| ...your mind. |
I can hear
some resistance now ‘It’s all very well saying disabled people are the same but
they’re not, are they. Not really. They need extra help with things sometimes
and so stories with a disabled character in them will inevitably be written
differently.’ Hmmmm… why do you suppose you think like this? Could it have anything to do with how
disabilities are portrayed through media, tainting our world view? Is it
perhaps time us writers challenged ourselves to think differently? What is
‘normal’ anyway? Wouldn’t it be something if society stopped seeing
disabilities as ‘different’ and start seeing people as people. ‘…but we as
writers are damned if we do and damned if we don’t! If I write a bad guy or a
good guy who is disabled I will be seen as writing a stereotyped disabled
character either way!’ Or maybe just write a character with depth, desires, dreams
and goals, emotional vulnerabilities and an emotive journey to go on – a
character is a character, whether disabled or not, let us feel empathy for
humankind and not another story that wants its audience to feel ‘sorry’ for the
‘victim in the wheelchair’.
5) DISABLED
ACTORS – “When a non-disabled actor plays a disabled character everyone is like
‘well done, you’re great’ and they get given awards. When a disabled person
plays a disabled character, people are like ‘they’re just playing themselves.’
So, what is acting exactly?”
 |
| Actress available; Female, blonde, age range 3 - 7. |
A debate
comes up in the meeting from a producer saying that there aren’t as many good,
experienced disabled actors as she would really like to play the parts of
disabled characters. Which raises two points… The first - this is a Catch 22
situation. If there were more parts written for disabled actors, there would be
more disabled characters on our screens, then more disabled people would be
encouraged to go to acting schools and see acting as a viable career – it all
starts with the script. The second point is, why are casting departments not
thinking of casting disabled actors in roles that have not been specifically
written for a disabled character?
Progress
is being made but it’s slow and still has a long way to go. There is an
audience of 10 million viewers out there who do not feel catered for. There is
an opportunity for you to review how you currently write your characters, for
your voice to be heard and maybe to even challenge society and media portrayal,
making programmes and characters more accessible, change things for the better...
you never know.
 |
| Wheelchair Rugby is awesome. |
The meeting
is coming to an end, “Why do we have the Olympics and the Paralympics?” someone
asks me. “Why can’t we all just compete in the same stadium?” “I don’t know…” I
reply. I’m embarrassed I have never thought to ask myself this question but
instead have just always accepted it as the way things are. We can’t change the
Olympics, but we can at least try to make sure we are all competing on the same
page.
Happy writing, reading and eating.
@NuttyNatter
